Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Thursday, December 12, 2024 75° Today's Paper


Live Well

Living apart together

NEW YORK TIMES
                                John Backe temporarily moved into Spoon’s apartment after heart surgery, but normally they live separately and get together about four times a week.
1/3
Swipe or click to see more

NEW YORK TIMES

John Backe temporarily moved into Spoon’s apartment after heart surgery, but normally they live separately and get together about four times a week.

NEW YORK TIMES 
                                Jill Spoon, 73, above, has lived in her Manhattan apartment since 1970. Spoon and her partner are among those “living apart together,” meaning they are in long-term relationships without sharing a home. Left, she’s shown with partner John Backe, 74.
2/3
Swipe or click to see more

NEW YORK TIMES

Jill Spoon, 73, above, has lived in her Manhattan apartment since 1970. Spoon and her partner are among those “living apart together,” meaning they are in long-term relationships without sharing a home. Left, she’s shown with partner John Backe, 74.

NEW YORK TIMES
                                John Backe uses his computer at Jill Spoon’s Manhattan apartment.
3/3
Swipe or click to see more

NEW YORK TIMES

John Backe uses his computer at Jill Spoon’s Manhattan apartment.

NEW YORK TIMES
                                John Backe temporarily moved into Spoon’s apartment after heart surgery, but normally they live separately and get together about four times a week.
NEW YORK TIMES 
                                Jill Spoon, 73, above, has lived in her Manhattan apartment since 1970. Spoon and her partner are among those “living apart together,” meaning they are in long-term relationships without sharing a home. Left, she’s shown with partner John Backe, 74.
NEW YORK TIMES
                                John Backe uses his computer at Jill Spoon’s Manhattan apartment.

About three years after she was widowed in 2016, Chicago psychotherapist Linda Randall, then 78, felt her friendship with a widowed man turning romantic. She’d dated him in her 20s, after taking her mother’s advice to volunteer as a candy-­striper so she could meet a doctor. In 2015 she’d reconnected with him as a friend. But now, considering romance with this man six years older gave her pause.

“He was not in great shape,” she said. “He’d had two heart attacks and two stents. I thought a lot about what to do.”

Coincidentally, he lived across the alley from her, and they spent most nights at her apartment. After dating for more than a year, they expressed mutual love. However, when he asked to move in with her, she said no. “He was hurt at first,” she recalled, “but I said, ‘I like my space, and we’re different in how we live.’”

About six months ago when he underwent surgery and needed recuperative care, Randall, heeding his wishes and using his funds, hired a live-in caregiver for him. Until he was well enough, the caregiver walked him over to her place. Now he manages on his own with his walker and spends weekends with her when his caregiver is off. Their intimacy continues.

With greater longevity, the doubling of the divorce rate since the 1990s for people over 50 and evolving social norms, older people like Randall are increasingly re-partnering in various forms. Cohabitation, for example, is more often replacing remarriage following divorce or widowhood, said Susan L. Brown, a sociologist at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.

These older adults are seeking (and finding) love, emotional support and an antidote to loneliness. But many older women, in particular, fear that a romantic attachment in later life will shortly lead to full-time caregiving. To avoid this role, some seek to meet their social needs solely from their relationships with family members and friends. Margaret Widuckel, a widowed nurse, 75, from Melbourne, Australia, said she sometimes misses having an intimate partner but fears she’d be drawn into caregiving.

“I also see my friends with frail husbands unable to pursue their own activities, and all their conversations are about what the doctor said or didn’t say.”

As researchers study those who do partner, however, they find that increasing numbers are choosing a kind of relationship known as LAT (rhymes with cat), for “living apart together.” These are long-term committed romantic relationships without sharing (or intending to share) a home.

“A big attraction of LAT is to avoid the potential responsibility of being a full-time caregiver,” said Ingrid Arnet Connidis, an emerita sociology professor at Western University in London, Ontario. “Women cared for their children, parents and spouse, and want to avoid getting into these traditional gender roles.”

While researchers have not yet delved deeply into the demographics of those in LAT relationships, anecdotally it seems to be more prevalent among those at high enough socioeconomic levels to be able to maintain separate households. In general, there is evidence that wealthier people who are single later in life are more likely to re-partner.

Jill Spoon, 73, and John Backe, 74, a LAT couple in New York City for nearly a decade, illustrate the complexity of this emotional bond. When Spoon, a retired administrator, and Backe, a retired pastor, met and fell in love, both were 64 and gave no thought to caregiving. Yet they opted to live in their own apartments, getting together about four times a week. Spoon, in particular, then working full time with an active social life, wanted to maintain her independence while enjoying their intimacy.

Three years later the issue of caregiving arose when Backe had major heart surgery and needed several months of at-home convalescent care; he moved into her apartment for those months. Spoon said she coordinated care with his two “amazing daughters,” backed up by a visiting nurse and friends, while she continued working. This teamwork is now their model for any future caregiving needs. Neither wants the other to become their primary caregiver. “I’d want John to retain as vital a lifestyle as possible,” she said, and he said he wants the same for her. She has no children but would rely on her long-term care insurance to hire help. For her partner’s care, she said, “I’d want to be involved enough because I care and love him, but not 24/7. I don’t have the energy for that,” and it would mean “I couldn’t do anything else.”

Expectations for care are lower for couples who do not marry or cohabit, social scientists said. Yet some question whether even expectations for married people are reasonable.

Allison Forti, a counseling professor at Wake Forest University, noted that some women might feel cultural and social expectations to serve as caregivers. “I think it’s important for women to know it is OK to not want to serve as a caregiver and to still hold value as women in society,” she said. Full-time caregiving “takes a significant physical and emotional toll on someone,” she noted. In a 2020 report from the National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP, 23% of Americans said caregiving had made their health worse.

People who want to avoid this role should discuss it early on in a new relationship, Forti said. She suggested an opening such as, “Having been a caregiver when my mother died, I want to discuss what we would do if one of us needed care.” Be prepared, she advised, that your partner might have different expectations.

These conversations should be detailed, experts advise. Each of you should state your wishes for your own care, and the financial and family resources you might have. Some alternatives to partner care include adult children, friends, paid caregivers and one or both partners moving into an assisted living, continuing care residence or a nursing home.

Randall, now 81, credits herself for creating a relationship that fulfills her needs without overwhelming her with her partner’s. “I have friends who say they never want to meet anybody unless they’re 10 or 15 years younger, because they see it as having to move in and be the sole caretaker,” she said. “I wasn’t about to do that. I think I have the best of two worlds. He’s a sweet, loving man, and he brings a lot to my table.”

© 2021 The New York Times Company

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines. Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.