Should the Office of Hawaiian Affairs have accepted $165M plus $3.5M more annually for a Kakaako Makai public covenant banning residences and limiting building heights?
-
C. No; too generous for OHA; limits already exist (302 Votes)
-
A. Yes; mutually beneficial for OHA, public (191 Votes)
-
B. No; OHA right to reject, not enough (138 Votes)
This is not a scientific poll — results reflect only the opinions of those voting.
0 Comments
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.
Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.
Please log in to comment
