Trump considering woman, openly gay man for leadership posts
WASHINGTON >> His nascent administration already under attack, President-elect Donald Trump was considering Monday whether to inject new diversity into the GOP by recommending a woman to lead the Republican Party and an openly gay man to represent the United States at the United Nations.
The moves, among dozens under consideration from his transition team, follow an intense and extended backlash from Trump’s decision on Sunday to appoint Steve Bannon, a man celebrated by the white nationalist movement, to serve as his chief strategist and senior adviser.
“After winning the presidency but losing the popular vote, President-elect Trump must try to bring Americans together – not continue to fan the flames of division and bigotry,” said House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi. She called Bannon’s appointment “an alarming signal” that Trump “remains committed to the hateful and divisive vision that defined his campaign.”
His inauguration just 66 days away, however, Trump focused on building his team and speaking to foreign leaders. He remained sequestered in Trump Tower in New York.
Inexperienced on the international stage, the Republican president-elect spoke to Russian President Vladimir Putin on the phone. His transition office said in a readout that “he is very much looking forward to having a strong and enduring relationship with Russia and the people of Russia.” Trump has spoken in recent days with the leaders of China, Mexico, South Korea and Canada.
At the same time, Trump was considering tapping Richard Grenell as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. He would be the first openly gay person to fill a Cabinet-level foreign policy post. Grenell, known in part for aggressive criticism of rivals on Twitter, previously served as U.S. spokesman at the U.N. under President George W. Bush.
Don't miss out on what's happening!
Stay in touch with top news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE!
Trump was also weighing whether to select Michigan GOP chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel, a niece of chief Trump critic and 2012 presidential nominee Mitt Romney. She would be the second woman ever to lead the Republican National Committee — and the first in four decades.
“I’ll be interested in whatever Mr. Trump wants,” McDaniel told The Associated Press on Monday, adding that she was planning to seek the Michigan GOP chairmanship again.
Appointing McDaniel to run the GOP’s political arm could be an effort to help the party heal the anger after a campaign in which Trump demeaned women. The appointment of Grenell, who has openly supported same-sex marriage, could begin to ease concerns by the gay community about Vice President-elect Mike Pence’s opposition to same-sex marriage during his time as Indiana governor.
The personnel moves under consideration were confirmed by people with direct knowledge of Trump’s thinking who were not authorized to publicly disclose private discussions. They stressed that the decisions were not final.
Internal deliberations about staffing come a day after Trump made overtures to warring Republican circles by appointing Bannon and RNC Chairman Reince Priebus as his White House chief of staff.
The former media executive, who led a website that appealed to the so-called “alt-right” — a movement often associated with efforts on the far right to preserve “white identity,” oppose multiculturalism and defend “Western values.”
Priebus on Monday defended the media mogul, saying the two made an effective pair as they steered Trump past Democrat Hillary Clinton and toward the presidency. He sought to distance Bannon from the incendiary headlines on his website, saying they were written by unspecified others.
“Together, we’ve been able to manage a lot of the decision making in regard to the campaign,” Priebus told NBC’s “Today.” ”It’s worked very, very well.”
President Barack Obama avoided any direct criticism of Trump’s personnel moves during an afternoon news conference, suggesting that the new president deserves “room to staff up.”
“It’s important for us to let him make his decisions,” Obama said. “The American people will judge over the course of the next couple of years whether they like what they see.”
The outgoing president encouraged Trump, however, to embrace a unifying tone.
“It’s really important to try to send some signals of unity and to reach out to minority groups or women or others that were concerned about the tenor of the campaign,” Obama said. “And I think that’s something he will — he will want to do.”
Trump’s hires were, at first glance, contradictory, though they fit a pattern of the celebrity businessman creating a veritable Rorschach test that allowed his supporters to see what they wanted. Priebus, who lashed the RNC to Trump this summer despite some intraparty objections, is a GOP operative with deep expertise of the Washington establishment that Trump has vowed to shake up. He has close ties to House Speaker Paul Ryan, a fellow Wisconsinite.
Bannon, meanwhile, helped transform the Breitbart News site into the leading mouthpiece of the party’s anti-establishment wing, which helped fuel the businessman’s political rise. Ryan has been one of his most frequent targets.
Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO and national director of the Anti-Defamation League, called Bannon’s selection “a sad day.”
Bannon, Greenblatt said, “presided over the rise of Breitbart as a haven online” for the “alt-right.” The website under Bannon’s leadership “trafficked in the some of the worst tropes, not just only against Jews — but the anti-Semitism is real — but also against other minorities, particularly Mexicans and Muslims.”
26 responses to “Trump considering woman, openly gay man for leadership posts”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
…an Openly Gay person, Richard Grenell and a Woman, Ronna Romney McDaniel to head the RNC is a tremendous effort for President elect Donald Trump,it to shows the American people ,he is for the people regardless of gender or gender oriented! I Like that ! Go Donald!
Wow – one woman and one gay man to fill his huge cabinet and staff. Doesn’t sound like much diversity in has already white male club.
And what specific percentage point would satisfy your “diversity” requirements?
For me, that would be about HALF or more of the cabinet being women, and at least a quarter representing LGBTQ and/or other historically oppressed minority groups – of which there are many.
btaim – What about just selecting the candidate who would do the best job?
etalayera: That would be great! If that is truly how people are chosen, then based upon the law of probability and looking at our society where, for example, half or more of the population is female, the cabinet will naturally end up being half women. I completely agree with you that the most qualified person should get the job. Unfortunately, since America (and most of the world) has longed favored men, and where many of the choices now being made are based on experience and networking, very highly qualified people may be passed over and instead they will choose people who have just been around longer.
Good enough for me because for the bigots one too many.
Is
Well, bt, that one half certainly doesn’t come as a surprise. Of course you understand that by putting race or sexual orientation as a quantitive requirement, you’ve pushed actual capability down the scale of importance.
There you are Kekaukaha! Same game huh? Where have you been brah ? Sleeping under the same rock as Ike and Klastri or have they left the country. Haaaaaaaaaaaaaa! In all seriousness. I’m guessing President Trump will pick Ambassador…..wait for it…wait for it….. Ambassador John Bolten. He’s not Gay ,but way more qualified & more experience.
Donald, if your reading my post. Just pick the person that’s best for the job! Don’t cave trying to appease your detractors, you should be color, gender, etc. blind in picking your people to work under you and for your cause. No widow dressing is needed, you got a BIG job ahead of you, you need the best person for the job
Donald are you trying to be Politically Correct now? Yikes!
It’s a exciting period in American history..President Elect Trump would make excellent selections no matter who they are.
Can’t wait to see who he’ll select for SOS, DOJ, DOD, IRS, HHS, FBI, VA, TSA…a start for DRAINING THE SWAMP!
Please President-elect Trump…..pick the best and the brightest you can find…..even if they are not Republicians…
Power to the People…….stick it to the Man….
I’am watching live on the internet the funeral of police officer Cody Brotherson…..Google his name.
milo yiannopoulos for press secretary. he would be an absolutely fabulous spokesperson for trump.
That would be a solid pick. The media organizations & liberals would lose it.
…as a people? We all pretty much want the SAMETHING! What separates us or the U.S.A. is Political affiliation . ie: Democrat VS. Republican. Or Liberalism VS Conservatism.
OK, just as long as they do their jobs.
How is choosing Chris Christie to be a member of your administration “draining the swamp”? He is as corrupt as they come.
What sexist homophobe. How dare he pick these people for his team!
Great point, this is the Republican party not the Democratic party. We didn’t vote for gays and women, am I right? Trump better watch out we won’t stand for to many decisions like this for long. #MAGA
I guess you did. You just didn’t know. I’m sure there’s a hell of a lot more pis-Ed off people in the country because of this.
Better hit the streets and join the others. I hear there’s some Muslims in line for appointments too. This is the only way he’s going to unite the country. Remember he lost the popular vote so all of you are really outnumbered. I’m really starting to enjoy this comedy. Bet you the KKK is pis-ing blood.
Watch Trump pick Caitlin-Bruce Jenner for the position and kill two birds with one stone.
Well, she is a conservative so it might work. Great suggestion.
You know, qualifications do matter. Personally, I don’t care if Trump appoints any number of black, white, brown, atheist, Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, pagan, male, female, LGBTQ, young, old, or physically challenged people – so long as they are qualified for and willing to do the job. People in outright favor of, or implying we should implement a quota system, are looking to turn the clock backward.