In our daily lives we often encounter people who confidently assert their knowledge on subjects they barely understand. This phenomenon, where people with limited expertise overestimate their competence, is known as the Dunning-Kruger effect. First identified by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999, this cognitive bias sheds light on the pitfalls of self-assessment and the importance of self-awareness.

We all are subject to the effect, regardless of our knowledge or lack of it.

The Dunning-Kruger effect occurs when people with low ability in a particular domain overestimate their knowledge or skills. This overestimation happens because their lack of expertise prevents them from recognizing their shortcomings. In other words, they are not skilled enough to know how unskilled they are. Conversely, individuals with high competence often underestimate their relative abilities, mistakenly assuming that tasks easy for them are easy for others as well.

The problem is metacognition — our ability to evaluate our thinking. If someone lacks knowledge in a certain area, they also cannot recognize their own mistakes. This creates a double burden: They are wrong and don’t even realize it.

You don’t have to look far to see the Dunning- Kruger effect in action. Social media is full of people confidently making claims about topics they barely understand — whether it’s science, politics or economics. In school you might see it when someone refuses to study but still expects a good grade.

This is nicely summarized in a comment from Frank Swain, a social media author:

“Study three years for a degree. Study three more for Ph.D. Join a lab and start working. Spend years studying problems. Form a hypothesis and gather evidence. Test the hypothesis and form conclusions. Report findings, clear peer review. Findings published, reported in press. A guy on the internet: ‘Bulls—.’”

One of the most famous real-life examples comes from a 1995 case where a man named McArthur Wheeler robbed banks while covering his face with lemon juice. He believed lemon juice was invisible ink and would prevent security cameras from capturing his face. Wheeler’s mistake wasn’t just bad science — it was a perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger effect at work.

The Dunning-Kruger effect has significant implications across various aspects of life. In education, students who overestimate their grasp of a subject might neglect studying adequately, leading to poorer performance. In the workplace, employees unaware of their incompetence might take on tasks beyond their capabilities, resulting in mistakes and decreased productivity. In health, individuals might dismiss medical advice, believing they understand their health better than professionals, potentially leading to harmful decisions.

Understanding the Dunning-Kruger effect can help us recognize when overconfidence is getting in the way of real learning. So the next time someone acts like an expert on something they know little about, you’ll know exactly what’s going on. More important, you’ll know how to avoid making the same mistake yourself.

The Dunning-Kruger effect serves as a reminder of the limitations inherent in self- assessment. By acknowledging that we might not always be the best judges of our own abilities, we open the door to personal growth, improved competence and more informed decision-making.

Richard Brill is a retired professor of science at Honolulu Community College. His column runs on the first and third Fridays of the month. Email questions and comments to brill@hawaii.edu.