Select an option below to continue reading this premium story.
Already a Honolulu Star-Advertiser subscriber? Log in now to continue reading.
Your recent article mentioned the Falls of Clyde and the state Department of Transportation’s (DOT) attempts to have her removed from the harbor (“State officials are working to redevelop Honolulu Harbor,” Star-Advertiser, May 31).
It was inaccurate to say that DOT “pushed for safety improvements.” While DOT made public statements that the ship was a safety hazard, it never provided evidence for that allegation. In 2014, we provided DOT with a drydock plan and a business plan. The ship was structurally sound and we had a phased restoration plan as a museum ship.
However, the drydock was a prerequisite before restoration could begin. We never got a response to our plan and in 2015 unsupported safety concerns were being communicated. If the ship is now unsafe after eight years of undermining our mission, who is to blame?
Bruce McEwan
President, Friends of Falls of Clyde Inc.
EXPRESS YOURSELF
The Honolulu Star-Advertiser welcomes all opinions. Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor.
>> Write us: We welcome letters up to 150 words, and guest columns of 500-600 words. We reserve the right to edit for clarity and length. Include your name, address and daytime phone number.
>> Mail: Letters to the Editor, Honolulu Star-Advertiser 7 Waterfront Plaza, 500 Ala Moana, Suite #7-500 Honolulu, HI 96813
>> Contact: 529-4831 (phone), letters@staradvertiser.com, staradvertiser.com/editorial/submit-letter Opens in a new tab
