Select an option below to continue reading this premium story.
Already a Honolulu Star-Advertiser subscriber? Log in now to continue reading.
Professor Leslie E. Sponsel described animism in foreign places many years ago, in addition to the archaeological evidence on Mauna Kea (“Spiritual development deserves same status as economic development,” Star-Advertiser, Island Voices, Oct. Opens in a new tab3) Opens in a new tab. He uses this to imply the Thirty Meter Telescope should not be built.
Should modern humans not develop areas near designated spiritual cave art in other places? If so, most places on Earth would be unfit for development.
Sponsel said shrines were built on Mauna Kea. But a shrine is not evidence the mountain itself was sacred. The claim to being sacred is built on the fact that a kapu was placed on Mauna Kea. But the kapu was lifted and the ancient religion banned — not by a haole but by the Hawaiian monarch himself. If the Hawaiian people at the time stopped believing Mauna Kea was sacred, why are we compelled to believe it today?
Finally, Sponsel claims the “protectors” are nonviolent. Can you be nonviolent if you forcefully and physically prevent others from accessing a place they have every right to access?
Michael Ronald
Hawaii Kai
Click here to read more Letters to the Editor.
