CRAIG T. KOJIMA / 2018
John Radcliffe, testifies during a hearing on the medical-aid-in-dying bill. Radcliffe, who has terminal cancer, has obtained and filled the lethal prescription.
Select an option below to continue reading this premium story.
Already a Honolulu Star-Advertiser subscriber? Log in now to continue reading.
There is something eerie about the juxtaposition of the two news articles on the front page of the Star-Advertiser on May 26: “Finding Amanda Eller” and “3 patients end lives with legal procedure.”
Whether the side-by-side placement of the narratives was coincidental or not, the articles provided a fresher perspective on how different people and groups view issues that are very important — in this case, making a choice between life and death.
On one side, Amanda Eller, faced with a life-or-death option, willed life and did everything possible to survive, resigning herself to a miracle. Eller said that “the power of prayer and (love) … could move mountains.”
On the opposite side, there are now three deaths since medically assisted suicide became legal on Jan. 1, with 17 prescriptions requested. I question why the writer chose to include in her article the note provided to the Star-Advertiser from Compassion & Choices about the Kona man who chose to die. I see the note as romanticizing something very tragic.
Florencia Aczon Ranchez
Ewa Beach
Click here to read more Letters to the Editor.