AP PHOTO/AUDREY MCAVOY, FILE
This Jan. 16, 2019 file photo shows Hawaii Senate President Ron Kouchi speaking on the opening day of the state Legislature in Honolulu. A Hawaii judge has rejected a lawsuit challenging the state Legislature’s “gut and replace” tactic of passing bills that have been stripped of their original content and replaced with entirely different details.
Select an option below to continue reading this premium story.
Already a Honolulu Star-Advertiser subscriber? Log in now to continue reading.
It’s disappointing, but not entirely surprising, that Circuit Judge Gary Chang dismissed a legal challenge to the “gut-and-replace” lawmaking maneuver so commonly used by state legislators. Replacing the “guts” of one bill that has advanced with text from an unrelated measure that’s lagged behind is sometimes necessary, House Speaker Scott Saiki said: It resolves some deadline problems on emergency issues.
But the good-government groups rightly argued that it’s far too routine, and shuts off public debate. The ruling says it’s legal, not that it’s right.
Showing up is key form of TMT communications
State Attorney General Clare Connors told legislators last week that her office, along with state and county law enforcement officials, are committed to ensuring safe passage of Thirty Meter Telescope construction crews while at the same time, upholding the constitutional rights of those opposing the project on Mauna Kea. That commitment will surely require good communications among all involved, including TMT International Observatory LLC (TIO) officials, of course.
TIO was absent from the packed TMT briefing at the state Capitol, opting instead to submit a written update. That move raised a few lawmakers’ eyebrows. Next time, TIO, send a representative.