U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is both right and wrong concerning freedom of religion and confirmation hearings for public office (“Gabbard accuses Hirono, Democratic colleagues of religious bigotry,” Star-Advertiser, Jan. 10).

No one should be disqualified based solely on their religious affiliation. Nonetheless, it is entirely appropriate to question whether prospective public appointees will be able to conduct the duties of the office in a way that respects the rights of those whose personal beliefs differ from their own.

It is especially prudent to raise such questions of nominees who join organizations that aim to further specific goals and principles within a religious context.

This does not mean that membership in such organizations should be grounds for disqualification, but it is fair to ask if the nominee’s personal convictions would be a factor in his/her professional decisions.

To ensure religious freedom, we must be vigilant to prevent government use of religious beliefs and practices as a basis for laws governing personal behavior.

Ronald A. Lynch

Moiliili

Click here to read more Letters to the Editor.