Obscure knife-gun cited in Chicago police shooting case
CHICAGO » It sounds like something James Bond would carry: A knife that’s also a gun.
But it is the kind of thing police officers are warned about from time to time, just as they are about guns disguised as belt buckles and tire gauges and motorcycle handlebars modified to fire a shotgun round.
The knife-gun, which isn’t well known outside of gun enthusiast circles, has pushed its way into the case surrounding the 2014 killing of Laquan McDonald, a black 17-year-old who was shot 16 times by a white Chicago police officer, Jason Van Dyke.
The city released more than 300 pages of police reports and other investigation documents late Friday pertaining to the case, including a December 2012 bulletin warning officers about a “revolver knife” and a reference to Van Dyke remembering the bulletin.
During an interview with his superiors about the sequence of events and his decision to use deadly force, Van Dyke said he was aware of throwing knives, spring-loaded knives that propel a blade and he “recalled a previously issued Chicago Police Department bulletin warning of a weapon which appeared to be a knife but which actually was capable of firing a bullet, making it a firearm.”
Internal investigators searched the department’s message center and found a bulletin issued in 2012 warning officers of a “revolver knife” capable of firing .22 caliber cartridges. That bulletin became part of the report.
Don't miss out on what's happening!
Stay in touch with top news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE!
Though a cursory Internet search by The Associated Press didn’t turn up any references to officers in Chicago or other U.S. locales being shot with such a weapon, the bulletin could find its way into the argument Van Dyke’s attorney has been making — that Van Dyke feared for his own safety when he shot McDonald.
“I remember back in the late ’80s and early ’90s about a shotgun affixed to the driver’s door,” said Dean Angelo, president of Chicago police officers’ union. “Police officers are warned about these things.”
Police departments have been aware of the existence of knife-guns for several years. In 2002, for example, law enforcement officials in London voiced concern over a knife equipped with a firing mechanism hidden in the handle that allowed it to fire five bullets.
Three years later, the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training in California issued its own training bulletin that included photographs of a “knife that conceals a revolver in its handle.”
Such weapons have been around for centuries, really.
An article on Guns.com describes a hunting knife and wheel lock pistol that was made in Germany in 1546. In the 1830s, the U.S. Navy came up with the Elgin pistol, which was a pistol with a knife attached to it.
According to the article, an Illinois company in the 1950s started selling a folding pocket knife that was also a gun. Then in the late 1990s, a company called Global Research and Development “designed the world’s first production fixed blade knife that held a multi-shot firearm inside its grip,” the website reported.
No listing for the company could be found and Guns.com reported that it seemed to have folded eight or nine years ago. Possibly that’s because the knives did not prove very popular, with the article saying less than a thousand were made.
———
Associated Press writer Carla K. Johnson contributed to this report.
4 responses to “Obscure knife-gun cited in Chicago police shooting case”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
He’s grabbing at straws.
pistols disguised as cigarette packs, cigarette lighters, cell phones, pagers, pens, cameras, knives and other items have been around for decades.
unless van dyke has shot other suspects who were walking away from him holding cigarette packs, cigarette lighters, cell phones, pagers, knives or whatever, it’s difficult to understand why he experienced such overwhelming fear for his life in this encounter.
it’s even more difficult to understand van dyke’s depth of fear if he never came into contact with any suspect armed with a disguised firearm in his entire police career.
The cover-up as purported is now being focused on the Mayor and his failure to act expeditiously to resolve the shooting. The delayed firing seems justified on the surface as it takes time to investigate an officer shooting situations. Remember the police union has much influence as well as obligation to protect the officer involved. The failure to act promptly also could be blamed on the Mayor for not pressuring the police to complete the investigation expeditiously. The Black population’s demands are justified. The Mayor certainly did not do enough to pressure the police to resolve the delay. More than a year to complete the investigation certainly seems unwarranted.
Whether you are in the military or law enforcement, “Fearing for your life” is just part of the job. If you can’t handle this then clearly you need to find another job, your “Safe Space.”
Van Dyke is trying to spin his utter failure to be a professional LEO on Urban Legends, anything he can. Sorry loser, just because you are incompetent does not give you the right to unload a full clip on a person lying on the ground, not a threat. Van Dyke can’t explain why the other officers present falsified their reports as compared to the video.
Interesting how the other officers present did not “Fear for their lives” and rightfully did not see a need to fire on Laquan who was not walking towards them.
Blame for this incident starts at the top, senior officer supported a culture of not holding officers accountable. New reported a records check showed 99% of officers with complaints against them for rule violations were never disciplined. Basically Chief’s policy to do nothing to his boys. Mayor did right in firing this loser