DENNIS ODA / DODA@STARADVERTISER.COM
The HART mass transit rail line along Kualakai Parkway bends east toward Waipahu.
Select an option below to continue reading this premium story.
Already a Honolulu Star-Advertiser subscriber? Log in now to continue reading.
The Honolulu City Council’s decision to approve Bill 42 violates the promise made to Honolulu taxpayers in 2006 that city funds would not be used for the rail project (“Council Opens in a new tab commits city funds to pay $44M for rail Opens in a new tabproject Opens in a new tab,” Star-Advertiser, Oct. 31).
On Dec. 14, 2006, then-Councilmember Romy Cachola wrote a committee report to then-Honolulu Council Chairman Donovan Dela Cruz, stating the committee would not use city funds for rail. That report resulted in an update to Bill 79, which stated all costs would be paid entirely from “any federal, state, or private revenues.”
Now, with the rail project vastly over-budget and behind schedule, the Council has, through Bill 42, inserted the word “city” into the list of revenues that can be used for rail.
This action significantly damages the Council’s credibility when it comes to any future statements and promises it might make about rail — or anything else.
Josh Mason
Director of communications,
Grassroot Institute of Hawaii
Click here to read more Letters to the Editor.
